Changes in the Higher Order Ocular Aberrations and Central Corneal Thickness After T-PRK and Fs-LASIK.

INTRODUCTION: Refractive surgery procedures, transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK), and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) are regarded as safe and efficacious methods for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism. These two methods do not have many differences in results when treating spherical myopia while differences exist in the treatment of astigmatism correction. Vector analysis presents a powerful tool to show the real differences between these two methods regarding high ocular aberrations and central corneal thickness of treated eyes. AIM: The aim of the study is to investigate changes in higher order ocular aberrations (HOAs) and central corneal thickness (CCT) following treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism above -5.00DS and up to -2.00DC after either T-PRK or Fs-LASIK. METHODS: Patients (30 eyes per group) underwent T-PRK (group I) or Fs-LASIK (group II) procedure using the Schwind Amaris 750S laser. HOAs (3mm&5mm pupil) and CCT were measured objectively at pre-, 1,3 & 6 months postop in each case. RESULTS: Key results at 6 months were: i) mean values of trefoil (5mm pupil) were 0.092µm (sd,0.055,95% CI 0.072 to 0.112) & 0.126µm (sd,0.078,95% CI 0.098 to 0.154) in group I, and 0.088µm (sd,0.058,95% CI 0.067 to 0.109) & 0.064µm (sd,0.034,95% CI 0.052 to 0.076) in group II (P=0.001 at 6 months); ii) Changes in CTT (ΔCTT) and best spherical equivalent correction (ΔBSE) was significant in group II (ΔCCT=-26.55[ΔBSE]-14.06,R=0.486,P=0.006) but not in group I (p=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: After T-PRK trefoil is worse than Fs-LASIK. The predictability of corneal changes is better following Fs-LASIK.

Incidence and Clinical Characteristics of Post LASIK Ectasia: A Review of over 30,000 LASIK Cases.

PURPOSE: To report the incidence of postoperative ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: A retrospective case review of 30,167 eyes (16,732 patients) was conducted following LASIK between August 2007 and August 2015. The follow-up was between 2 and 8 years. Tomography was performed after 2 years postop. After identifying cases of ectasia, the charts of these patients were examined to identify any common factors that may have predisposed them to develop ectasia. RESULTS: Ten eyes of seven patients developed post-LASIK ectasia. Eight eyes had been treated for myopia and myopic astigmatism, two eyes for mixed astigmatism. There were no cases of ectasia after LASIK for hyperopia. All 10 cases of ectasia had a flap that was created using the Moria M2 mechanical microkeratome (average flap thickness 118.15 ± 12.88 µm) and refractive error corrected using the Wavelight Allegretto excimer laser. Retrospectively, most prevalent risk factors were thin cornea (≤ 500 µm, 50% of cases), anterior topographic map irregularities (e.g., asymmetric bow tie, 40% of cases), Ectasia Risk Score > 3 (40% of cases), percent tissue thickness alteration ≥ 40% (20% of cases) and low residual stromal bed (≤ 300 µm, 30% of cases). One eye had no identifiable risk factors. In the retrospective chart review 14.97% (4,506) of all the eyes had similar risk factors to the cases that went on to develop ectasia. CONCLUSION: The incidence of ectasia was 0.033% over 8 years. The incidence could be higher as some cases may destabilize beyond this period and some patients were lost to follow-up asymptomatic of any clinical signs. Other intrinsic factors may trigger the development of post LASIK ectasia. The current widely accepted risk factors are not sufficiently rigorous for screening out potential ectasia from developing after LASIK. There is a need to augment accuracy with higher sensitivity and specificity.

Apparent Corneal Ectasia After Bilateral Intrastromal Femtosecond Laser Treatment for Presbyopia.

PURPOSE: To report a case of apparent corneal ectasia after intrastromal femtosecond laser treatment for presbyopia (INTRACOR). METHODS: A healthy 56-year-old male with low hyperopia underwent an unremarkable bilateral INTRACOR procedure in March/April 2011. The patient was discharged after follow-up and returned 5 years later. RESULTS: Before discharge, the monocular logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) values were R, 0.0 and L, 0.10. In both eyes near (UNVA) visual acuities were 0.0. There were signs of slight posterior central corneal steepening without loss of corneal stability. Five years postop, monocular UDVA and UNVA values were 0.4 and 0.0, respectively. Ectasia was observed in both eyes, and the centrally placed 5 concentric rings after the INTRACOR procedure were visible under slit-lamp biomicroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear reason to explain why the patient developed bilateral corneal steepening. It could be that the patient's corneal stromal fibers gradually weakened over this 5-year period.